Kudu, Alibaba Trade Assurance, Escrow.com, TradeSafe — which one actually protects a group order?
All four lock money until delivery is confirmed. Only one of the four can do it for a group of buyers pooling a single order: Kudu. Here's the comparison, line by line.
| Provider | Fee | KYC friction | Disputes | Group orders |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kudu | 0.5% (min €1, max €25) | Standard, built for Europe and Africa | Resolved in-app, funds frozen while a dispute is open | Yes |
| Alibaba Trade Assurance | Free | Standard Alibaba account | Often resolves in the seller's favour | No |
| Escrow.com | Published, tiered fee schedule | Sometimes rejects non-US identity documents | Funds can get stuck in 'reviewing payment' for weeks | No |
| TradeSafe | Insurer-backed fee schedule (South Africa) | Built for the South African market | Not publicly detailed | No |
Comparison based on each provider's published terms and publicly reported user feedback — always check current rates and terms before choosing.
Non-custodial escrow, built for more than one buyer.
Alibaba Trade Assurance, Escrow.com and TradeSafe all protect one buyer and one seller — a single pair. None of the three can lock the shares of several buyers pooling the same order, then split the payout separately to the supplier, the organiser and the platform once delivery is confirmed.
Kudu locks funds on-chain (Stellar), not in a proprietary internal ledger — so the money is never in Kudu's hands, only held until the agreed terms are met. It's the same mechanic protecting a cross-border group order today as protects a single deal between two strangers.

